The Issue: Maya Wiley’s name to cut back NYPD funding, whilst she advantages from non-public safety.
Brilliant mayoral candidate Maya Wiley declared that, if elected mayor, she is going to defund the NYPD by a staggering $1 billion (“Not Maya problem!” June 8).
However, this candidate has uncared for to say that she lives in a complicated Brooklyn neighborhood that’s patrolled and guarded by a personal safety agency.
Wiley desires to cut back the manpower of those that are there to defend you and me, however she considers herself too elite for the on a regular basis police safety we rely on.
Leave it to the No. #1 hypocritical phony, Rep. Alexandra Ocasio-Cortez, to again Wiley and her loopy liberal agenda.
I say, neglect Wiley. New Yorkers deserve a heck of loads higher than this.
Wow, did I simply have my eyes opened: A politician, on this case one working for mayor, is a hypocrite. Quite a revelation.
Wiley has non-public employed police safety whereas campaigning for defunding the police for the remainder of us. She mentioned her accomplice paid for it.
While public security and the police is the No. 1 concern, there are multitudes of those different points that may require sturdy management.
Let’s hear an actual chief step up and speak about what we mere mortals are speaking about to our neighbors, our youngsters and the individuals who care. The politicians’ silence is deafening.
The Post’s cowl says all of it: “Not Maya problem.”
This occurs all the time — our nice politicians say one factor, like “defund the police,” in the meantime they reside underneath a blanket of safety.
How are you able to defund the police when crime is so rampant? How many extra younger harmless kids shall be killed, simply because you are attempting to get a vote?
Why not go into these neighborhoods and hear to the folks together with the group leaders — they’re begging for extra police safety. They don’t have the luxurious of a gated group.
This is precisely the sort of conduct from our legislators that turns off the American public from voting. What blatant hypocrisy.
Wiley’s actions are in direct distinction to that of candidate Eric Adams. Thank God there are nonetheless level-headed, sensible folks working for workplace. Let’s simply hope he wins, and other people like her don’t.
The most direct path to seizing weapons is, and all the time has been, stop-and-frisk. But that tactic is not going to be supported by the faint-hearted candidates for mayor.
Just the thought offends the sensibilities of politicians who pander to maintain their jobs. They, in fact, are usually not in danger. Candidate Wiley’s residential space is protected by a personal safety service.
Stop-and-frisk, denounced due to low yields, has advantage as a result of it saves lives.
Two instruments — the anti-crime items and stop-and -risk, each aborted by this mayor — had a direct unfavourable influence on gun violence in our metropolis. They should be reinstated.
How comfy and reassuring it should be to somebody like Wiley that, after a tough day, she will return to her $2.7 million residence, guarded by non-public safety.
In the wake of the worst mayor in residing reminiscence, the election of one other progressive liberal agitator is precisely what the metropolis doesn’t want.
The election is an opportunity to present help for legislation and order and the police. In the finish, voters get what they deserve.
Wiley has an asinine platform of defunding the police, as she friends out of her lavish brownstone ivory tower with full safety safety, whereas the neighborhoods surrounding her are rife with crime.
She’s simply one other social-justice warrior with complete disrespect and disrespect for legislation and order.
The plethora of buffoons working for mayor is staggering.
Want to weigh in on immediately’s tales? Send your ideas (alongside together with your full identify and metropolis of residence) to firstname.lastname@example.org. Letters are topic to enhancing for readability, size, accuracy and elegance.